英国是天堂？月亮比国内要圆？     

5月10日，有媒体曝出了一个“17名移英港人”的故事，再次让大家有了更清醒的认识。      

事情发生在日不落帝国，17名港人透过中介，千里迢迢来到这里一间工厂打工，俗称打“Agent工”，性质类似外判工、散工，有别于由厂方自行聘请的“长工”。 

“Agent工”在英国非常普遍，是不少港人移英后的主流工种，但待遇和环境堪忧。    

长期在香港养尊处优习惯了，来到异国他乡当“二等公民”，打“Agent工”，能适应吗？

很快，这17名港人因不满工作现状，开始了自己的“小叛逆”，那就是罢工，并联署争取改善工作环境。   

有BNO身份撑腰，又是17人的群体规模，本以为能够受到英国政府和工厂重视，但万万没想到，厂方管理层却毫不留情，当即将他们解雇。   

给出的理由是什么？在英国，罢工有既定程序，例如须经工会决定，及罢工前向雇主提出通知期，该批港人参与的罢工，并不符合这些程序，因此非“成功罢工”，被雇主认为是旷工，违反雇佣合约。    WARSAW, Poland -- Polish opposition leader Donald Tusk declared the beginning of a new era for his country after opposition parties appeared to have won enough votes in Sunday's parliamentary election to oust the governing nationalist conservative party.That party, Law and Justice, has bickered with allies and faced accusations of eroding rule of law at home in its eight years in power. It appeared that voters were mobilized like never before, voting in even greater numbers than when the nation ousted the communist authorities in 1989. In some places people were still in line when polling officially closed, but all were allowed to vote. If the result predicted by an exit poll holds, Law and Justice won but also lost. It got more seats than any other party but not enough to be able to lead a government that can pass laws in the legislature. The Ipsos exit poll suggested that Law and Justice obtained 200 seats. Its potential partner, the far-right Confederation got 12 seats, a showing the party acknowledged was a defeat.It also showed that three opposition parties have likely won a combined 248 seats in the 460-seat lower house of parliament, the Sejm. The largest of the groups is Civic Coalition, led by Tusk, a former prime minister and former European Union president. It won 31.6% of votes, the exit poll said. “I have been a politician for many years. I’m an athlete. Never in my life have I been so happy about taking seemingly second place. Poland won. Democracy has won. We have removed them from power,” Tusk told his cheering supporters.“This result might still be better, but already today we can say this is the end of the bad time, this is end of Law and Justice rule," Tusk added.Law and Justice leader Jaroslaw Kaczynski acknowledged the ambiguous result. He told supporters at his headquarters that his party’s result, at nearly 37% of the vote, according to the exit poll, was a success, making it the party to win the most votes for three parliamentary elections in a row. “We must have hope and we must also know that regardless of whether we are in power or in the opposition, we will implement this (political) project in various ways and we will not allow Poland to be betrayed," Kaczynski said.If the result holds, and Law and Justice is the single party with the most seats, then it would most likely get the first chance to try to build a government.It falls to President Andrzej Duda, who is an ally of Law and Justice, to tap a party to try to form a government.Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki said on Polsat News that Duda “will entrust the mission of forming the government to the winning party and in this first step we will certainly try to build a parliamentary majority."Three opposition parties, Tusk's Civic Coalition, Third Way and the New Left, ran on separate tickets but with the same promises of seeking to oust Law and Justice and restore good ties with the European Union.Wlodzimierz Czarzasty, a leader of the Left party, vowed to work with the others to “create a democratic, strong, reasonable and predictable government.”Katarzyna Pelczynska-Nalecz, the head of election campaign for Third Way, called it a “huge day for our democracy.”Votes were still being counted and the state electoral commission says it expects to have final results by Tuesday morning.At stake are the health of the nation’s constitutional order, its legal stance on LGBTQ+ rights and abortion, and the foreign alliances of a country that has been a crucial ally to Ukraine after Russia launched its full-scale invasion.LGBTQ+ rights activist Bart Staszewski called it the end of a “nightmare” for himself as a gay man and others.“This is just the beginning of reclaiming of our country. The fight is ahead but we are breathing fresh air today,” Staszewski said.Environmental activist Dominika Lasota was emotional with relief, saying “we have our future.”Law and Justice has eroded checks and balances to gain more control over state institutions, including the courts, public media and the electoral process itself.During the campaign many Poles described the vote as the most important one since 1989, when a new democracy was born after decades of communism.Turnout Sunday appeared to be even higher than the 63% of voters who turned out for the 1989 election that led to the ouster of the communists. Despite many uncertainties ahead, what appeared certain was that support for the governing party has shrunk since the last election in 2019 when it won nearly 44% of the vote, its popularity dented by high inflation, allegations of cronyism and bickering with European allies.There is a high level of state ownership in the Polish economy, and the governing party has built up a system of patronage, handing out thousands of jobs and contracts to its loyalists. A political change could open the way for the EU to release billions of euros in funding that has been withheld over what the EU viewed as democratic erosion.Piotr Buras, of the European Council of Foreign Relations, said the opposition had gained from “growing fatigue” with the government among Poles, "beyond the groups usually supporting the liberals.” The fate of Poland's relationship with Ukraine was also at stake. The Confederation party campaigned on an anti-Ukraine message, accusing the country of lacking gratitude to Poland for its help in Russia's war. Its poor showing will be a relief for Kyiv.A referendum on migration, the retirement age and other issues was held simultaneously. Some government opponents called on voters to boycott the referendum, saying it was an attempt by the government to galvanize its supporters. Many voters were seen refusing to take part in the referendum.___Associated Press journalists Kwiyeon Ha, Pietro De Cristofaro and Rafal Niedzielski contributed to this report.。      

说白了，就是你不是英国工会会员，没缴纳会费，凭什么要保护你？还有资格罢工？

当然，这17名移英港人依然不服被炒鱿鱼的结果，毕竟英国是他们向往之地，心里一时肯定无法接受，于是又控诉管理层涉嫌歧视港人，最后闹成功了吗？  

截至目前，他们仍没得到相关部门回应，是不是有点自取其辱？

更令人诧异的是，在十多名港人被炒后，帮着发起联署的长工代表，竟叫他们“息事宁人”。  

就这么算了？何时变得这么能隐忍？以前在香港可没这么乖，不是要将“民主自由”坚持到底吗？     

迫于无奈，这17名被炒鱿鱼的移英港人只得向媒体诉苦：“唔认同”英国职场生态，“但系无奈地都要接受”，英国BNO就是个大骗局，我想回香港。  

外国千般好，不及家乡炊烟袅，出门在外，有冤都没处诉，听着哽咽的声音，看着欲哭无泪的眼神，是不是该让人同情呢？  

但很多网民知晓后，在香港某论坛炸开了锅，纷纷表示：不值得同情，自作孽不可活，咎由自取，后果自负！以前在香港作威作福惯了，现在英国行不通，当然心里不好受。  

更有人讥讽道：“人国家欢迎你去？”“真天真，BNO去英国啦！”    

其实，大家不同情这群人也是有道理的。  

还记得3年前英国大张旗鼓推出所谓BNO“5+1”签证移民计划吗？那时正是香港“黑暴”还没消停的时候。  

此举不仅助长暴力乱港势力嚣张气焰，更吸引不少黄丝卖楼卖车去英国呼吸“自由空气”。   

谁知，他们不是说去了就成为了“英国公民”，而是要满足一个看似简单的条件。  

那就是要求港人在英国连续居住5年，然后再住1年可申请入籍。      

意思要等好几年才能拿到“绿卡”，等到很多人把在香港赚得的积蓄都用光光，被彻底吸干之后再说，谁熬得住？     

更重要的是政策随时还可能面临大调整，说不定等到最后一年时，英国政府宣布：BNO“5+1”取消了，这不是相当于画了个大饼吗？  

在这漫长的等待中，不少港人移英找长工，面临各种困难。他们多数会暂做“Agent工”，等待机会转长工。   

早前，“安迪工房”曾在视频中教导“外国人如何在英国较轻松找到长工”，但秘诀让很多港人扎心了。     

因为秘诀就是“避开香港人”。   

为什么呢？“安迪工房”直言：“呢个，其实系一个正面慨睇法嚟慨”，“其实系同香港人嘅工作能力，同埋态度有关。

二 | ”   

听到这个解释后，移英港人内心是不是五味杂陈？是不是该反思一下BNO陷阱了呢？  

从2021年1月开始，英国推出的所谓“BNO移英计划”，背后用心之险恶，人尽皆知。      

但那些借着“BNO移英计划”移英的港人，往往没有经过深思熟虑，抵达后才惊觉处处不适应。

其中暴青Olivia就深有体会，他于2022年7月以遭受“政治迫害”为由申请庇护，后想申请BNO签证在英逗留，这要求他要撤回庇护申请。谁知，他马上失去了居留许可，被认作“逾期逗留人士”，申请BNO也失败了，还成为了“黑户”，实在令人“可悲可叹”。

另外，“日不落帝国”本身就前景堪忧，自身难保，哪有经费照顾移民呢？  

 2022年底起，英国的城市接连传出破产消息，瑟罗克、克罗伊登、北安普敦和斯劳、萨里郡沃金市等地方政府先后宣布破产。    

“破产潮”更蔓延到大城市，英国第二大城市伯明翰去年九月宣布破产，而英国中部城市诺丁汉市议会亦在去年年底宣布“实质破产”，当地政府直言，由于儿童和成人照护需求增加，加上无家可归者人数上涨，导致该市超支逾2000万英镑。

三 |

在此情况下，自然要想办法开源，英国政府冥思苦想，结果还是决定向移英港人等新移民开刀，企图尽吸香港钱财。    

BNO移民必须证明自己有足够在英国生活6个月的财力，并支付高达3370英镑（约3.3万港元）的5年期签证费用和医疗保健附加费，相当于花钱购买英国政府的所谓“庇护”。       

30多岁的Philip就抱怨说：英国政府“区别对待”港人。  

英国“决议基金会”早前也在一份报告中指出，伦敦在英国经济版图中表现优异，移英港人要想继续选择居于伦敦，那就必须付出更多。    

为什么这样说呢？因为伦敦生活成本之高、物价之贵，超乎很多新移民想象。

四 |     

大家心知肚明，实际上有多少移英港人有能力和资格居于伦敦？既然不能居于伦敦，只好退而求其次选择一些次级城市，这就意味着，他们的生活不会有多么好。

移民，本身并没有所谓“对”或“错”，但过得好不好，最好还是用事实说话。

五 |

英国政府推出针对港人的英国国民（海外）护照（BNO）移民计划已满三年。伯明翰大学和兰开斯特大学研究人员于今年1月30日发布最新报告，揭露BNO移民在住房、就业、就医、求学等多个方面陷入困境。  

意思就是说，移英港人面临几大难题：租房难、就业难、看病难、上学难、享受公共福利难。   

报告指出，BNO移民自掏腰包购买英国的“庇护”，抵达英国后却没有资格享受公共经济援助等福利。同时，由于学历和专业资质不被承认，移英港人还普遍面临长期失业和薪酬待遇下降等问题。     

在就业方面，也有当地组织做了调查，显示在2000名年龄介于25岁至64岁的受访移英港人中，仅52%找到工作，当中包括全职（35% ）、兼职（9%）及自雇（6%），就业率较当地的76%为低。  

正是由于以上原因，不少港人移民英国后，逼不得已，只得选择了回流。      

近日有移英港人于网上群组发文，好奇问到有没有移英港人回流，引来一众网民留言讲述身边亲戚朋友等经历，又分析回流原因，包括当初草率移英、不适应英国生活、子女教育和经济问题等。

有网民形容，回流港人有如“上了铁达尼救生艇，然后发现救生艇无铁达尼船舱舒服，又返回了铁达尼”，又有人说“未入籍就回去当然算回流”、“最多算是到英国体验”。   

还有网友讽刺道：“千万不要回香港, 留英搞黑暴工资好过打工”，“不怕，香港还有千千万万的傻子来支持你的岗位”。   

移民海外乃人生大事，一些港人却禁不住BNO的诱惑，背井离乡，自讨苦吃，这能怪谁？

能用则用之,不用则弃之，“日不落帝国”只欢迎对他们有用的人，如今“黑暴”已经过去，对于英国以及其他西方国家来讲，“反中乱港”任务失败，“黑暴”分子也好，移英黄丝也罢，都已经没有利用价值。

六 |

不论是申请BNO签证被拒，还是被歧视遭冷遇，这一定只是开始，毕竟弃子一文不值。